Search a number
-
+
6030838481 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1011001110111011…
…10100101011010001
3120120022002100010012
411213131310223101
544322343312411
62434233444305
7302310165323
oct54735645321
916508070105
106030838481
112615284238
121203870695
137515a55a5
14412d59613
152546ca18b
hex167774ad1

6030838481 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 6030838482. Its totient is φ = 6030838480.

The previous prime is 6030838409. The next prime is 6030838493. The reversal of 6030838481 is 1848380306.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 4018418881 + 2012419600 = 63391^2 + 44860^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 6030838481 - 210 = 6030837457 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×60308384812 = 72742025567820774722, which contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (6030832481) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 3015419240 + 3015419241.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3015419241).

Almost surely, 26030838481 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

6030838481 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

6030838481 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

6030838481 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 110592, while the sum is 41.

The square root of 6030838481 is about 77658.4733367841. The cubic root of 6030838481 is about 1820.2284542953.

It can be divided in two parts, 60308 and 38481, that added together give a palindrome (98789).

The spelling of 6030838481 in words is "six billion, thirty million, eight hundred thirty-eight thousand, four hundred eighty-one".