Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1111010010100… |
… | …1110011010000 |
3 | 11110200100210101 |
4 | 3310221303100 |
5 | 112404244402 |
6 | 10210342144 |
7 | 1406063422 |
oct | 364516320 |
9 | 143610711 |
10 | 64134352 |
11 | 332250a7 |
12 | 1958a954 |
13 | 10396a29 |
14 | 8736812 |
15 | 596cb87 |
hex | 3d29cd0 |
64134352 has 10 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 124260338. Its totient is φ = 32067168.
The previous prime is 64134337. The next prime is 64134377. The reversal of 64134352 is 25343146.
64134352 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 47941776 + 16192576 = 6924^2 + 4024^2 .
It is a super-2 number, since 2×641343522 = 8226430212919808, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 64134352.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2004183 + ... + 2004214.
Almost surely, 264134352 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
64134352 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (60125986).
64134352 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
64134352 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4008405 (or 4008399 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 8640, while the sum is 28.
The square root of 64134352 is about 8008.3925977689. The cubic root of 64134352 is about 400.2797043681.
Adding to 64134352 its reverse (25343146), we get a palindrome (89477498).
The spelling of 64134352 in words is "sixty-four million, one hundred thirty-four thousand, three hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •