Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11001110111000010101100 |
3 | 110202102010000 |
4 | 121313002230 |
5 | 3213412202 |
6 | 401144300 |
7 | 111423000 |
oct | 31670254 |
9 | 13672100 |
10 | 6779052 |
11 | 3910225 |
12 | 232b090 |
13 | 1534797 |
14 | c86700 |
15 | 8dd91c |
hex | 6770ac |
6779052 has 120 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 21005600. Its totient is φ = 1905120.
The previous prime is 6779033. The next prime is 6779093. The reversal of 6779052 is 2509776.
6779052 is digitally balanced in base 4 and base 8, because in such bases it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
6779052 is strictly pandigital in base 8.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 6778998 and 6779016.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 39 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 111102 + ... + 111162.
Almost surely, 26779052 is an apocalyptic number.
6779052 is the 1647-th heptagonal number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 6779052, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (10502800).
6779052 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (14226548).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
6779052 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
6779052 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 98 (or 73 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 26460, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 6779052 is about 2603.6612682912. The cubic root of 6779052 is about 189.2589044333.
The spelling of 6779052 in words is "six million, seven hundred seventy-nine thousand, fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.080 sec. • engine limits •