Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100000100101000010… |
… | …1101011111101101000 |
3 | 20200120210202022011222 |
4 | 1001022011223331220 |
5 | 2121240343402022 |
6 | 52050150441212 |
7 | 5024510165210 |
oct | 1011205537550 |
9 | 220523668158 |
10 | 69962481512 |
11 | 27741aa6960 |
12 | 11686363208 |
13 | 679c73c471 |
14 | 3559a4b240 |
15 | 1c4719e242 |
hex | 104a16bf68 |
69962481512 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 167237360640. Its totient is φ = 26650183680.
The previous prime is 69962481503. The next prime is 69962481557. The reversal of 69962481512 is 21518426996.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×699624815122 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4952363 + ... + 4966469.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1306541880).
Almost surely, 269962481512 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 69962481512, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (83618680320).
69962481512 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (97274879128).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
69962481512 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
69962481512 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 14311 (or 14307 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 1866240, while the sum is 53.
The spelling of 69962481512 in words is "sixty-nine billion, nine hundred sixty-two million, four hundred eighty-one thousand, five hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.088 sec. • engine limits •