Search a number
-
+
73201370041 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100010000101100100…
…1000100001110111001
320222221112021212222101
41010023021010032321
52144404022320131
653343411223401
75200666244002
oct1041311041671
9228845255871
1073201370041
11290542a0838
121222aba7b61
136b97775957
143785c7a1a9
151d866cec61
hex110b2443b9

73201370041 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 73201370042. Its totient is φ = 73201370040.

The previous prime is 73201369949. The next prime is 73201370069. The reversal of 73201370041 is 14007310237.

It is an a-pointer prime, because the next prime (73201370069) can be obtained adding 73201370041 to its sum of digits (28).

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 52459321600 + 20742048441 = 229040^2 + 144021^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (14007310237) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 73201370041 - 29 = 73201369529 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 73201369991 and 73201370009.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (73201373041) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 36600685020 + 36600685021.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (36600685021).

Almost surely, 273201370041 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

73201370041 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

73201370041 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

73201370041 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3528, while the sum is 28.

Adding to 73201370041 its reverse (14007310237), we get a palindrome (87208680278).

The spelling of 73201370041 in words is "seventy-three billion, two hundred one million, three hundred seventy thousand, forty-one".