Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000101111001… |
… | …00000110011101 |
3 | 12002220022112222 |
4 | 10113210012131 |
5 | 122230123140 |
6 | 11134435125 |
7 | 1546630640 |
oct | 427440635 |
9 | 162808488 |
10 | 73286045 |
11 | 38405988 |
12 | 20662aa5 |
13 | 1224c431 |
14 | 9a39a57 |
15 | 66795b5 |
hex | 45e419d |
73286045 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 105131520. Its totient is φ = 47980800.
The previous prime is 73285999. The next prime is 73286063. The reversal of 73286045 is 54068237.
It is a happy number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 73286045 - 218 = 73023901 is a prime.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (35) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors. Since it is squarefree, it is also a hoax number.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (35).
It is a Curzon number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 73285996 and 73286014.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 104195 + ... + 104895.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3285360).
Almost surely, 273286045 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
73286045 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (31845475).
73286045 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
73286045 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 845.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 40320, while the sum is 35.
The square root of 73286045 is about 8560.7268967068. The cubic root of 73286045 is about 418.4790890472.
The spelling of 73286045 in words is "seventy-three million, two hundred eighty-six thousand, forty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •