Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000110000000… |
… | …11001001101101 |
3 | 12010010210000111 |
4 | 10120003021231 |
5 | 122243210404 |
6 | 11141300021 |
7 | 1551000511 |
oct | 430031155 |
9 | 163123014 |
10 | 73413229 |
11 | 3849249a |
12 | 20704611 |
13 | 122952a6 |
14 | 9a70141 |
15 | 66a2104 |
hex | 460326d |
73413229 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 73413230. Its totient is φ = 73413228.
The previous prime is 73413209. The next prime is 73413257. The reversal of 73413229 is 92231437.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 39715204 + 33698025 = 6302^2 + 5805^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 73413229 - 27 = 73413101 is a prime.
It is equal to p4306819 and since 73413229 and 4306819 have the same sum of digits, it is a Honaker prime.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 73413229.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (73413209) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 36706614 + 36706615.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (36706615).
Almost surely, 273413229 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
73413229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
73413229 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
73413229 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its digits is 9072, while the sum is 31.
The square root of 73413229 is about 8568.1520177924. The cubic root of 73413229 is about 418.7210318121.
The spelling of 73413229 in words is "seventy-three million, four hundred thirteen thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •