Search a number
-
+
7350153730649 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110101011110101011101…
…0011010101101001011001
3222000200000211222111112222
41222331113103111221121
51430411103323340044
623344340343113425
71356013442603612
oct152752723255131
928020024874488
107350153730649
112384201187814
129a8613742875
13414169000c22
141b5a6c284c09
15cb2daebc8ee
hex6af574d5a59

7350153730649 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 7350153730650. Its totient is φ = 7350153730648.

The previous prime is 7350153730643. The next prime is 7350153730679. The reversal of 7350153730649 is 9460373510537.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3752910441049 + 3597243289600 = 1937243^2 + 1896640^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-7350153730649 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×73501537306492 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 7350153730649.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (7350153730643) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 3675076865324 + 3675076865325.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3675076865325).

Almost surely, 27350153730649 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

7350153730649 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

7350153730649 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

7350153730649 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7144200, while the sum is 53.

The spelling of 7350153730649 in words is "seven trillion, three hundred fifty billion, one hundred fifty-three million, seven hundred thirty thousand, six hundred forty-nine".