Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001011010101… |
… | …01000001011100 |
3 | 12111122011220100 |
4 | 10231111001130 |
5 | 130210211302 |
6 | 11501021100 |
7 | 1646262531 |
oct | 455250134 |
9 | 174564810 |
10 | 78991452 |
11 | 406524a1 |
12 | 22554790 |
13 | 13499307 |
14 | a6c2d88 |
15 | 6e04d1c |
hex | 4b5505c |
78991452 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 212599296. Its totient is φ = 24643584.
The previous prime is 78991439. The next prime is 78991463. The reversal of 78991452 is 25419987.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (45) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 78991398 and 78991407.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 206053 + ... + 206435.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2952768).
Almost surely, 278991452 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 78991452, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (106299648).
78991452 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (133607844).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
78991452 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
78991452 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 747 (or 742 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 181440, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 78991452 is about 8887.7135417384. The cubic root of 78991452 is about 429.0685661512.
The spelling of 78991452 in words is "seventy-eight million, nine hundred ninety-one thousand, four hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •