Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100000001000… |
… | …010011000000 |
3 | 120211220121212 |
4 | 200020103000 |
5 | 4124010332 |
6 | 500305252 |
7 | 131406443 |
oct | 40102300 |
9 | 16756555 |
10 | 8422592 |
11 | 4833022 |
12 | 29a2228 |
13 | 198b8a9 |
14 | 119365a |
15 | b158b2 |
hex | 8084c0 |
8422592 has 28 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 16892016. Its totient is φ = 4166400.
The previous prime is 8422573. The next prime is 8422597. The reversal of 8422592 is 2952248.
8422592 is digitally balanced in base 5, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (32).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (8422597) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (5) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5813 + ... + 7115.
Almost surely, 28422592 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 8422592, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (8446008).
8422592 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (8469424).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
8422592 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
8422592 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1416 (or 1406 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 11520, while the sum is 32.
The square root of 8422592 is about 2902.1702224370. The cubic root of 8422592 is about 203.4613497058.
The spelling of 8422592 in words is "eight million, four hundred twenty-two thousand, five hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.195 sec. • engine limits •