Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011100111000111101111… |
… | …101110010111011001110100 |
3 | 102022101112120121202012201220 |
4 | 103213013233232113121310 |
5 | 42301120040101230314 |
6 | 503235140521150340 |
7 | 24111306426663636 |
oct | 2347075756273164 |
9 | 368345517665656 |
10 | 86251260180084 |
11 | 25533a5489578a |
12 | 98100a462b3b0 |
13 | 39185c738628c |
14 | 17428246aca56 |
15 | 9e88d71623a9 |
hex | 4e71efb97674 |
86251260180084 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 201296719739808. Its totient is φ = 28744165871520.
The previous prime is 86251260180067. The next prime is 86251260180091. The reversal of 86251260180084 is 48008106215268.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×862512601800843 (a number of 43 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 781716102 + ... + 781826429.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8387363322492).
Almost surely, 286251260180084 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
86251260180084 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (115045459559724).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
86251260180084 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
86251260180084 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1563547135 (or 1563547133 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1474560, while the sum is 51.
The spelling of 86251260180084 in words is "eighty-six trillion, two hundred fifty-one billion, two hundred sixty million, one hundred eighty thousand, eighty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •