Search a number
-
+
86376644667301 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10011101000111100100001…
…001110001110011110100101
3102022211112012212210010002211
4103220330201032032132211
542310143332013323201
6503412514402003421
724123335530355542
oct2350744116163645
9368745185703084
1086376644667301
112558214709783a
129830457646571
133927389c6b951
14174891ab9dbc9
159ebcc4bbb651
hex4e8f2138e7a5

86376644667301 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 86376644667302. Its totient is φ = 86376644667300.

The previous prime is 86376644667193. The next prime is 86376644667329. The reversal of 86376644667301 is 10376644667368.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 75956977008900 + 10419667658401 = 8715330^2 + 3227951^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 86376644667301 - 29 = 86376644666789 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×863766446673013 (a number of 43 digits) contains 333 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (86376644667331) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 43188322333650 + 43188322333651.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (43188322333651).

Almost surely, 286376644667301 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

86376644667301 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

86376644667301 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

86376644667301 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 438939648, while the sum is 67.

Adding to 86376644667301 its sum of digits (67), we get a palindrome (86376644667368).

The spelling of 86376644667301 in words is "eighty-six trillion, three hundred seventy-six billion, six hundred forty-four million, six hundred sixty-seven thousand, three hundred one".