Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1010101010110… |
… | …01001010001110 |
3 | 20020101202220110 |
4 | 11111121022032 |
5 | 140402303113 |
6 | 12514100450 |
7 | 2134454625 |
oct | 525311216 |
9 | 206352813 |
10 | 89494158 |
11 | 46576316 |
12 | 25b7a726 |
13 | 15705930 |
14 | bc586bc |
15 | 7ccbbc3 |
hex | 555928e |
89494158 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 194576256. Its totient is φ = 27276768.
The previous prime is 89494109. The next prime is 89494159. The reversal of 89494158 is 85149498.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×894941582 = 16018408632257928, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (89494159) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2985 + ... + 13707.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (6080508).
Almost surely, 289494158 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 89494158, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (97288128).
89494158 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (105082098).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
89494158 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
89494158 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 10848.
The product of its digits is 414720, while the sum is 48.
The square root of 89494158 is about 9460.1351998795. The cubic root of 89494158 is about 447.2993105704.
The spelling of 89494158 in words is "eighty-nine million, four hundred ninety-four thousand, one hundred fifty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •