Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000111100011010… |
… | …11001110110110100 |
3 | 212110222011112102202 |
4 | 20132031121312310 |
5 | 122112232433402 |
6 | 4102355124032 |
7 | 441266140220 |
oct | 103615316664 |
9 | 25428145382 |
10 | 9096764852 |
11 | 394898308a |
12 | 191a5a3618 |
13 | b1c8303c6 |
14 | 624203780 |
15 | 383942b02 |
hex | 21e359db4 |
9096764852 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 18193529760. Its totient is φ = 3898613496.
The previous prime is 9096764827. The next prime is 9096764861. The reversal of 9096764852 is 2584676909.
It is a happy number.
9096764852 is an admirable number.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×90967648522 (a number of 21 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (56) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 162442202 + ... + 162442257.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1516127480).
Almost surely, 29096764852 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9096764852 is a primitive abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors, none of which is abundant.
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9096764852 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9096764852 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 324884470 (or 324884468 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 6531840, while the sum is 56.
The square root of 9096764852 is about 95376.9618513821. The cubic root of 9096764852 is about 2087.5120423463.
The spelling of 9096764852 in words is "nine billion, ninety-six million, seven hundred sixty-four thousand, eight hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •