Search a number
-
+
930138674369 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11011000100100001001…
…01011101010011000001
310021220211222000101002012
431202100211131103001
5110214411000034434
61551144431502305
7124125463165562
oct15422045352301
93256758011065
10930138674369
1132951903aa43
12130325687995
13699337b6038
143303a00c169
15192dd3e93ce
hexd89095d4c1

930138674369 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 930138674370. Its totient is φ = 930138674368.

The previous prime is 930138674359. The next prime is 930138674417. The reversal of 930138674369 is 963476831039.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 707807563969 + 222331110400 = 841313^2 + 471520^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (963476831039) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-930138674369 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×9301386743692 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (930138674359) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 465069337184 + 465069337185.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (465069337185).

Almost surely, 2930138674369 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

930138674369 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

930138674369 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

930138674369 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 17635968, while the sum is 59.

The spelling of 930138674369 in words is "nine hundred thirty billion, one hundred thirty-eight million, six hundred seventy-four thousand, three hundred sixty-nine".