Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111010010111111… |
… | …011111010100100 |
3 | 2112020211022002200 |
4 | 322113323322210 |
5 | 4001203301002 |
6 | 241102534500 |
7 | 33161236203 |
oct | 7227737244 |
9 | 2466738080 |
10 | 979353252 |
11 | 462901659 |
12 | 233b97430 |
13 | 127b8b587 |
14 | 940d523a |
15 | 5aea3b1c |
hex | 3a5fbea4 |
979353252 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2631370560. Its totient is φ = 306244800.
The previous prime is 979353223. The next prime is 979353253. The reversal of 979353252 is 252353979.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 979353198 and 979353207.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (979353253) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 63502 + ... + 77402.
Almost surely, 2979353252 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 979353252, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1315685280).
979353252 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1652017308).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
979353252 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
979353252 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 14033 (or 14028 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 510300, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 979353252 is about 31294.6201766374. The cubic root of 979353252 is about 993.0698344171.
The spelling of 979353252 in words is "nine hundred seventy-nine million, three hundred fifty-three thousand, two hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.076 sec. • engine limits •