Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101101000110100… |
… | …1000100011110111100 |
3 | 100100222020111021200000 |
4 | 1123101221010132330 |
5 | 3101204130004144 |
6 | 113005031034300 |
7 | 10036456243125 |
oct | 1332151043674 |
9 | 310866437600 |
10 | 98006484924 |
11 | 38623118787 |
12 | 16bb220b990 |
13 | 931b7c601a |
14 | 4a5a3b304c |
15 | 2839208769 |
hex | 16d1a447bc |
98006484924 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 260433678960. Its totient is φ = 32221286784.
The previous prime is 98006484883. The next prime is 98006484941. The reversal of 98006484924 is 42948460089.
98006484924 is a `hidden beast` number, since 98 + 0 + 0 + 64 + 8 + 492 + 4 = 666.
98006484924 is digitally balanced in base 7, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (54).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 619659 + ... + 761570.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3617134430).
Almost surely, 298006484924 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
98006484924 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (162427194036).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
98006484924 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
98006484924 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1381321 (or 1381307 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3981312, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 98006484924 in words is "ninety-eight billion, six million, four hundred eighty-four thousand, nine hundred twenty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.075 sec. • engine limits •