Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101110001101100001… |
… | …1101000000000000001 |
3 | 100111011002011000200001 |
4 | 1130123003220000001 |
5 | 3111214433323123 |
6 | 113331150400001 |
7 | 10112133431302 |
oct | 1343303500001 |
9 | 314132130601 |
10 | 99238182913 |
11 | 390a5404701 |
12 | 17296800001 |
13 | 9486a382bc |
14 | 4b35bd47a9 |
15 | 28ac4060ad |
hex | 171b0e8001 |
99238182913 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 99238182914. Its totient is φ = 99238182912.
The previous prime is 99238182889. The next prime is 99238182937. The reversal of 99238182913 is 31928183299.
It is a balanced prime because it is at equal distance from previous prime (99238182889) and next prime (99238182937).
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 95816868849 + 3421314064 = 309543^2 + 58492^2 .
It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (31928183299) is a distict prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 99238182913 - 221 = 99236085761 is a prime.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (99238182983) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 49619091456 + 49619091457.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (49619091457).
Almost surely, 299238182913 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
99238182913 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
99238182913 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
99238182913 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its digits is 1679616, while the sum is 55.
The spelling of 99238182913 in words is "ninety-nine billion, two hundred thirty-eight million, one hundred eighty-two thousand, nine hundred thirteen".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.089 sec. • engine limits •