Search a number
-
+
100003013021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101110100100010100…
…1001110000110011101
3100120010101022102100002
41131020221032012131
53114301232404041
6113535111344045
710140111404552
oct1351051160635
9316111272302
10100003013021
11394581038aa
121746a982025
139579325cb2
144ba9606a29
15290463259b
hex1748a4e19d

100003013021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 100003013022. Its totient is φ = 100003013020.

The previous prime is 100003012997. The next prime is 100003013023. The reversal of 100003013021 is 120310300001.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 70971624025 + 29031388996 = 266405^2 + 170386^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-100003013021 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1000030130212 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 100003013023, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 100003012993 and 100003013011.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (100003013023) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 50001506510 + 50001506511.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (50001506511).

Almost surely, 2100003013021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

100003013021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

100003013021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

100003013021 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 18, while the sum is 11.

Adding to 100003013021 its reverse (120310300001), we get a palindrome (220313313022).

The spelling of 100003013021 in words is "one hundred billion, three million, thirteen thousand, twenty-one".