Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001010011000000101101… |
… | …0100100101101011111110 |
3 | 1100012020022112112002112100 |
4 | 2110300023110211223332 |
5 | 2314440042300023402 |
6 | 33424004105445530 |
7 | 2103346642205565 |
oct | 224601324455376 |
9 | 40166275462470 |
10 | 10222212111102 |
11 | 3291241276032 |
12 | 11911721a08a6 |
13 | 591c482343b4 |
14 | 274a87206bdc |
15 | 12ad8344371c |
hex | 94c0b525afe |
10222212111102 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 22367414623320. Its totient is φ = 3373667362800.
The previous prime is 10222212111091. The next prime is 10222212111151. The reversal of 10222212111102 is 20111121222201.
10222212111102 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2811387652 + ... + 2811391287.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (931975609305).
Almost surely, 210222212111102 is an apocalyptic number.
10222212111102 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (12145202512218).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10222212111102 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10222212111102 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 5622779048 (or 5622779045 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 64, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 10222212111102 its reverse (20111121222201), we get a palindrome (30333333333303).
The spelling of 10222212111102 in words is "ten trillion, two hundred twenty-two billion, two hundred twelve million, one hundred eleven thousand, one hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •