Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110000010111111000… |
… | …1100011111100111100 |
3 | 100221010121221012000212 |
4 | 1200233301203330330 |
5 | 3200221432032242 |
6 | 115415552411552 |
7 | 10335155456204 |
oct | 1405761437474 |
9 | 327117835025 |
10 | 103880736572 |
11 | 40067a70a08 |
12 | 18171546bb8 |
13 | 9a46804582 |
14 | 505660b404 |
15 | 2a7eca2782 |
hex | 182fc63f3c |
103880736572 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 199679222400. Its totient is φ = 47067243696.
The previous prime is 103880736551. The next prime is 103880736577. The reversal of 103880736572 is 275637088301.
It is a happy number.
103880736572 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1038807365722 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 103880736572.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (103880736577) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 29712422 + ... + 29715917.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8319967600).
Almost surely, 2103880736572 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
103880736572 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (95798485828).
103880736572 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
103880736572 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 59428385 (or 59428383 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1693440, while the sum is 50.
The spelling of 103880736572 in words is "one hundred three billion, eight hundred eighty million, seven hundred thirty-six thousand, five hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •