Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111110110101100… |
… | …100110111110111 |
3 | 2201110201112111200 |
4 | 332311210313313 |
5 | 4124340411210 |
6 | 252335503543 |
7 | 35060552562 |
oct | 7665446767 |
9 | 2643645450 |
10 | 1054232055 |
11 | 4a10a5168 |
12 | 255087bb3 |
13 | 13a547966 |
14 | a00274d9 |
15 | 628450c0 |
hex | 3ed64df7 |
1054232055 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1852373328. Its totient is φ = 554553216.
The previous prime is 1054232027. The next prime is 1054232059. The reversal of 1054232055 is 5502324501.
It is a happy number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1054232055 - 26 = 1054231991 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×10542320552 = 2222810451579046050, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (1054232059) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 157177 + ... + 163746.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (77182222).
Almost surely, 21054232055 is an apocalyptic number.
1054232055 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (15) formed by its first and last digit.
1054232055 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (798141273).
1054232055 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1054232055 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 321007 (or 321004 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 6000, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 1054232055 is about 32468.9398502631. The cubic root of 1054232055 is about 1017.7600644837.
Adding to 1054232055 its reverse (5502324501), we get a palindrome (6556556556).
The spelling of 1054232055 in words is "one billion, fifty-four million, two hundred thirty-two thousand, fifty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •