Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000000111110100011… |
… | …100001010001100010000 |
3 | 10220220200222122100201220 |
4 | 100013310130022030100 |
5 | 121122443322230202 |
6 | 2204544333125040 |
7 | 143020661240061 |
oct | 20076434121420 |
9 | 3826628570656 |
10 | 1107907617552 |
11 | 397951a7010a |
12 | 15a878029780 |
13 | 80624143c08 |
14 | 3b8a17a4568 |
15 | 1dc44cedabc |
hex | 101f470a310 |
1107907617552 has 160 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2929314845184. Its totient is φ = 360751104000.
The previous prime is 1107907617497. The next prime is 1107907617571. The reversal of 1107907617552 is 2557167097011.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1107907617495 and 1107907617504.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 158472777 + ... + 158479767.
Almost surely, 21107907617552 is an apocalyptic number.
1107907617552 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 1107907617552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1464657422592).
1107907617552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1821407227632).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1107907617552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1107907617552 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 7537 (or 7531 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 926100, while the sum is 51.
The spelling of 1107907617552 in words is "one trillion, one hundred seven billion, nine hundred seven million, six hundred seventeen thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •