Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110011000000100… |
… | …00010110001110010 |
3 | 1011000012121202121200 |
4 | 23030002002301302 |
5 | 144100313203242 |
6 | 5304012432030 |
7 | 603460001460 |
oct | 131402026162 |
9 | 34005552550 |
10 | 12013022322 |
11 | 5105046524 |
12 | 23b3178616 |
13 | 1195a73c42 |
14 | 81d64b830 |
15 | 4a499404c |
hex | 2cc082c72 |
12013022322 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 29759758080. Its totient is φ = 3430766016.
The previous prime is 12013022317. The next prime is 12013022363. The reversal of 12013022322 is 22322031021.
12013022322 is digitally balanced in base 5, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 12013022295 and 12013022304.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 280254 + ... + 320262.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (619994960).
Almost surely, 212013022322 is an apocalyptic number.
12013022322 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (17746735758).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
12013022322 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
12013022322 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 42407 (or 42404 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 288, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 12013022322 its reverse (22322031021), we get a palindrome (34335053343).
The spelling of 12013022322 in words is "twelve billion, thirteen million, twenty-two thousand, three hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •