Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11001010011101100… |
… | …10010000101010000 |
3 | 1022001220022222202202 |
4 | 30221312102011100 |
5 | 210311232410314 |
6 | 10124120302332 |
7 | 660461400566 |
oct | 145166220520 |
9 | 38056288682 |
10 | 13586997584 |
11 | 5842562426 |
12 | 27723119a8 |
13 | 1386b97254 |
14 | 92c6c9a36 |
15 | 547c520de |
hex | 329d92150 |
13586997584 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 30023167680. Its totient is φ = 5916395520.
The previous prime is 13586997581. The next prime is 13586997637. The reversal of 13586997584 is 48579968531.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 13586997584.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (13586997581) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 191654 + ... + 252794.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (375289596).
Almost surely, 213586997584 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 13586997584, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (15011583840).
13586997584 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (16436170096).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
13586997584 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
13586997584 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 61228 (or 61222 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 65318400, while the sum is 65.
The spelling of 13586997584 in words is "thirteen billion, five hundred eighty-six million, nine hundred ninety-seven thousand, five hundred eighty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •