Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10100010100111111010… |
… | …101011010011011100000 |
3 | 11221112201020111122010102 |
4 | 110110333111122123200 |
5 | 140341401244332323 |
6 | 2545423412321532 |
7 | 202632103102646 |
oct | 24247725323340 |
9 | 4845636448112 |
10 | 1396926949088 |
11 | 4994849326a0 |
12 | 1a68980132a8 |
13 | a1964056258 |
14 | 4b87c429196 |
15 | 2650d48b328 |
hex | 1453f55a6e0 |
1396926949088 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 3114114232320. Its totient is φ = 611088192000.
The previous prime is 1396926949087. The next prime is 1396926949097. The reversal of 1396926949088 is 8809496296931.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (1396926949081) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1621433 + ... + 2328711.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (32438689920).
Almost surely, 21396926949088 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 1396926949088, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1557057116160).
1396926949088 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1717187283232).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1396926949088 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1396926949088 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 707512 (or 707504 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 362797056, while the sum is 74.
The spelling of 1396926949088 in words is "one trillion, three hundred ninety-six billion, nine hundred twenty-six million, nine hundred forty-nine thousand, eighty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.076 sec. • engine limits •