Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001010010111000100… |
… | …0111000101111111000 |
3 | 120021011220220101011101 |
4 | 2110232020320233320 |
5 | 10104020043341410 |
6 | 201205401141144 |
7 | 14352133340344 |
oct | 2245610705770 |
9 | 507156811141 |
10 | 159687871480 |
11 | 617a5705405 |
12 | 26b4718a7b4 |
13 | 1209b6b34a7 |
14 | 7a2c2a4624 |
15 | 4249384d3a |
hex | 252e238bf8 |
159687871480 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 359804541600. Its totient is φ = 63785045376.
The previous prime is 159687871477. The next prime is 159687871501. The reversal of 159687871480 is 84178786951.
159687871480 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2787012 + ... + 2843731.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (11243891925).
Almost surely, 2159687871480 is an apocalyptic number.
159687871480 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
159687871480 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (200116670120).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
159687871480 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
159687871480 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5631463 (or 5631459 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 27095040, while the sum is 64.
The spelling of 159687871480 in words is "one hundred fifty-nine billion, six hundred eighty-seven million, eight hundred seventy-one thousand, four hundred eighty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.083 sec. • engine limits •