Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11110010001011110… |
… | …01111000111010100 |
3 | 1112221200101010010011 |
4 | 33020233033013110 |
5 | 231241144242024 |
6 | 11244424210004 |
7 | 1113520622650 |
oct | 171057170724 |
9 | 45850333104 |
10 | 16252727764 |
11 | 6990271a19 |
12 | 3197009904 |
13 | 16c02423a0 |
14 | b0275ba60 |
15 | 651cb8094 |
hex | 3c8bcf1d4 |
16252727764 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 35333117568. Its totient is φ = 6369545088.
The previous prime is 16252727731. The next prime is 16252727767. The reversal of 16252727764 is 46772725261.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (49) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (16252727767) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 169699 + ... + 247594.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (736106616).
Almost surely, 216252727764 is an apocalyptic number.
16252727764 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (14) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
16252727764 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (19080389804).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
16252727764 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
16252727764 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 417424 (or 417422 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 1975680, while the sum is 49.
The spelling of 16252727764 in words is "sixteen billion, two hundred fifty-two million, seven hundred twenty-seven thousand, seven hundred sixty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •