Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101010010011000… |
… | …1010111111001110000 |
3 | 201011002112200212012010 |
4 | 2322210301113321300 |
5 | 11240240210331000 |
6 | 232010501202520 |
7 | 20321302366530 |
oct | 2724461277160 |
9 | 634075625163 |
10 | 200332902000 |
11 | 77a62778420 |
12 | 329ab100440 |
13 | 15b78299aca |
14 | 99a63bb4c0 |
15 | 53277d1d50 |
hex | 2ea4c57e70 |
200332902000 has 640 divisors, whose sum is σ = 809662464000. Its totient is φ = 41399424000.
The previous prime is 200332901957. The next prime is 200332902019. The reversal of 200332902000 is 209233002.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (21).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 127 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 91936911 + ... + 91939089.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1265097600).
Almost surely, 2200332902000 is an apocalyptic number.
200332902000 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (20) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 200332902000, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (404831232000).
200332902000 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (609329562000).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
200332902000 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200332902000 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2422 (or 2406 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 648, while the sum is 21.
The spelling of 200332902000 in words is "two hundred billion, three hundred thirty-two million, nine hundred two thousand".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •