Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101010011000011001… |
… | …110110000111100001000 |
3 | 21010110201202000011102101 |
4 | 131103003032300330020 |
5 | 230441234422401440 |
6 | 4140523445243144 |
7 | 265312643450236 |
oct | 35230316607410 |
9 | 7113652004371 |
10 | 2013320122120 |
11 | 7069317a377a |
12 | 286240a034b4 |
13 | 117b1705aa38 |
14 | 6d633949956 |
15 | 375875b569a |
hex | 1d4c33b0f08 |
2013320122120 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 4529970274860. Its totient is φ = 805328048832.
The previous prime is 2013320122117. The next prime is 2013320122139. The reversal of 2013320122120 is 212210233102.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 1647921633796 + 365398488324 = 1283714^2 + 604482^2 .
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 25166501487 + ... + 25166501566.
Almost surely, 22013320122120 is an apocalyptic number.
2013320122120 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (20) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
2013320122120 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2516650152740).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
2013320122120 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
2013320122120 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 50333003064 (or 50333003060 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 288, while the sum is 19.
Adding to 2013320122120 its reverse (212210233102), we get a palindrome (2225530355222).
The spelling of 2013320122120 in words is "two trillion, thirteen billion, three hundred twenty million, one hundred twenty-two thousand, one hundred twenty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •