Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101010001001… |
… | …0101001010101 |
3 | 1112120121122202 |
4 | 1110102221111 |
5 | 21124041334 |
6 | 2105334245 |
7 | 355550123 |
oct | 124225125 |
9 | 45517582 |
10 | 22096469 |
11 | 1152244a |
12 | 7497385 |
13 | 4768745 |
14 | 2d12913 |
15 | 1e1717e |
hex | 1512a55 |
22096469 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 22110540. Its totient is φ = 22082400.
The previous prime is 22096429. The next prime is 22096489. The reversal of 22096469 is 96469022.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 12517444 + 9579025 = 3538^2 + 3095^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 22096469 - 220 = 21047893 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×220964692 = 976507884535922, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (22096429) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4334 + ... + 7935.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5527635).
Almost surely, 222096469 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
22096469 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (14071).
22096469 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
22096469 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 14070.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 46656, while the sum is 38.
The square root of 22096469 is about 4700.6881411130. The cubic root of 22096469 is about 280.6128963882.
The spelling of 22096469 in words is "twenty-two million, ninety-six thousand, four hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •