Search a number
-
+
222020413061 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1100111011000101110…
…0101010011010000101
3210020001222120120102112
43032301130222122011
512114144211204221
6245554511550405
722016605241666
oct3166134523205
9706058516375
10222020413061
118618180a487
123704222b405
1317c2346a5a5
14aa6285736d
155b9678615b
hex33b172a685

222020413061 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 222020413062. Its totient is φ = 222020413060.

The previous prime is 222020413057. The next prime is 222020413129. The reversal of 222020413061 is 160314020222.

It is a happy number.

222020413061 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 214341220900 + 7679192161 = 462970^2 + 87631^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 222020413061 - 22 = 222020413057 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (222020413031) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 111010206530 + 111010206531.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (111010206531).

Almost surely, 2222020413061 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

222020413061 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

222020413061 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

222020413061 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1152, while the sum is 23.

Adding to 222020413061 its reverse (160314020222), we get a palindrome (382334433283).

The spelling of 222020413061 in words is "two hundred twenty-two billion, twenty million, four hundred thirteen thousand, sixty-one".