Search a number
-
+
2300122201109 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100001011110001001111…
…101110111110000010101
322010220000110201100010012
4201132021331313300111
5300141122240413414
64520354521210005
7325115113060025
oct41361175676025
98126013640105
102300122201109
11807527022637
12311942330905
13138b927aaa15
147d47dd21a85
153ec7127933e
hex21789f77c15

2300122201109 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2300122201110. Its totient is φ = 2300122201108.

The previous prime is 2300122201103. The next prime is 2300122201159. The reversal of 2300122201109 is 9011022210032.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1692731102500 + 607391098609 = 1301050^2 + 779353^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2300122201109 - 212 = 2300122197013 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×23001222011092 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2300122201103) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1150061100554 + 1150061100555.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1150061100555).

Almost surely, 22300122201109 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2300122201109 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2300122201109 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2300122201109 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 432, while the sum is 23.

The spelling of 2300122201109 in words is "two trillion, three hundred billion, one hundred twenty-two million, two hundred one thousand, one hundred nine".