Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100001011111100101010… |
… | …101010010010101100000 |
3 | 22011000222022001221101011 |
4 | 201133211111102111200 |
5 | 300202242144102302 |
6 | 4521210555550304 |
7 | 325201105154524 |
oct | 41374525222540 |
9 | 8130868057334 |
10 | 2301655065952 |
11 | 80814330a690 |
12 | 3120ab75b394 |
13 | 139078238c38 |
14 | 7d58773bd84 |
15 | 3ed10b165d7 |
hex | 217e5552560 |
2301655065952 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 4947070467024. Its totient is φ = 1045414656000.
The previous prime is 2301655065929. The next prime is 2301655065971. The reversal of 2301655065952 is 2595605561032.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 2301655065896 and 2301655065905.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2009949 + ... + 2939932.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (103063968063).
Almost surely, 22301655065952 is an apocalyptic number.
2301655065952 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (22) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
2301655065952 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2645415401072).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
2301655065952 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
2301655065952 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4951223 (or 4951215 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2430000, while the sum is 49.
The spelling of 2301655065952 in words is "two trillion, three hundred one billion, six hundred fifty-five million, sixty-five thousand, nine hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.081 sec. • engine limits •