Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11100001010000001… |
… | …110111010111000101 |
3 | 2220000222210011100212 |
4 | 130022001313113011 |
5 | 443404124012013 |
6 | 21515554445205 |
7 | 2120126350553 |
oct | 341201672705 |
9 | 86028704325 |
10 | 30233032133 |
11 | 11904838577 |
12 | 5a38b93805 |
13 | 2b0a746535 |
14 | 166b388bd3 |
15 | bbe30a6a8 |
hex | 70a0775c5 |
30233032133 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 30233032134. Its totient is φ = 30233032132.
The previous prime is 30233032129. The next prime is 30233032147. The reversal of 30233032133 is 33123033203.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 27042815809 + 3190216324 = 164447^2 + 56482^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 30233032133 - 22 = 30233032129 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 30233032099 and 30233032108.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (30233032183) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 15116516066 + 15116516067.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15116516067).
Almost surely, 230233032133 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
30233032133 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
30233032133 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
30233032133 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2916, while the sum is 23.
Adding to 30233032133 its reverse (33123033203), we get a palindrome (63356065336).
The spelling of 30233032133 in words is "thirty billion, two hundred thirty-three million, thirty-two thousand, one hundred thirty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •