Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101100100001110111… |
… | …101010000111101011111 |
3 | 102002100101102200221201110 |
4 | 231210032331100331133 |
5 | 402300331204200223 |
6 | 10354254030313103 |
7 | 442141042460355 |
oct | 55441675207537 |
9 | 12070342627643 |
10 | 3131282100063 |
11 | aa7a73127637 |
12 | 426a44058793 |
13 | 199381213110 |
14 | ab7aa7837d5 |
15 | 566b9e0dd93 |
hex | 2d90ef50f5f |
3131282100063 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 4496199938608. Its totient is φ = 1926942830784.
The previous prime is 3131282100059. The next prime is 3131282100101. The reversal of 3131282100063 is 3600012821313.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3131282100063 - 22 = 3131282100059 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 3131282100063.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (3131282100013) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 40144642270 + ... + 40144642347.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (562024992326).
Almost surely, 23131282100063 is an apocalyptic number.
3131282100063 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1364917838545).
3131282100063 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3131282100063 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 80289284633.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5184, while the sum is 30.
Adding to 3131282100063 its reverse (3600012821313), we get a palindrome (6731294921376).
The spelling of 3131282100063 in words is "three trillion, one hundred thirty-one billion, two hundred eighty-two million, one hundred thousand, sixty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.089 sec. • engine limits •