Search a number
-
+
33243344551 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11110111101011101…
…010010111010100111
310011210210012212200101
4132331131102322213
51021040244011201
623134412124531
72254541523604
oct367535227247
9104723185611
1033243344551
111310a00187a
126539166747
13319a2cb8a1
1418750b76ab
15ce8739d01
hex7bd752ea7

33243344551 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 33243344552. Its totient is φ = 33243344550.

The previous prime is 33243344489. The next prime is 33243344573. The reversal of 33243344551 is 15544334233.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (15544334233) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-33243344551 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×332433445512 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 33243344551.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (33243044551) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 16621672275 + 16621672276.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (16621672276).

Almost surely, 233243344551 is an apocalyptic number.

33243344551 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

33243344551 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

33243344551 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 259200, while the sum is 37.

Adding to 33243344551 its reverse (15544334233), we get a palindrome (48787678784).

The spelling of 33243344551 in words is "thirty-three billion, two hundred forty-three million, three hundred forty-four thousand, five hundred fifty-one".