Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011111100001… |
… | …110000010001001 |
3 | 212022112001202012 |
4 | 103330032002021 |
5 | 1141121200400 |
6 | 53110345305 |
7 | 11201440556 |
oct | 2374160211 |
9 | 768461665 |
10 | 334553225 |
11 | 161934876 |
12 | 9405b235 |
13 | 544083b6 |
14 | 32609a2d |
15 | 1e586d35 |
hex | 13f0e089 |
334553225 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 427573080. Its totient is φ = 259550720.
The previous prime is 334553213. The next prime is 334553231. The reversal of 334553225 is 522355433.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 12 ways, for example, as 200618896 + 133934329 = 14164^2 + 11573^2 .
It is not a de Polignac number, because 334553225 - 210 = 334552201 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3345532252 = 223851720715801250, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 334553191 and 334553200.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 116507 + ... + 119343.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17815545).
Almost surely, 2334553225 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
334553225 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (93019855).
334553225 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
334553225 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2989 (or 2984 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 54000, while the sum is 32.
The square root of 334553225 is about 18290.7961827800. The cubic root of 334553225 is about 694.2060702683.
The spelling of 334553225 in words is "three hundred thirty-four million, five hundred fifty-three thousand, two hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •