Search a number
-
+
34995269 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000010101111…
…1110001000101
32102211221111002
42011133301011
532424322034
63250023045
7603312011
oct205376105
972757432
1034995269
1118832511
12b877a85
13733387a
14490d541
153113e7e
hex215fc45

34995269 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 34995270. Its totient is φ = 34995268.

The previous prime is 34995227. The next prime is 34995271. The reversal of 34995269 is 96259943.

34995269 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 31528225 + 3467044 = 5615^2 + 1862^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-34995269 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×349952692 = 2449337704764722, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 34995271, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (34991269) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 17497634 + 17497635.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17497635).

Almost surely, 234995269 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

34995269 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

34995269 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

34995269 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 524880, while the sum is 47.

The square root of 34995269 is about 5915.6799271090. The cubic root of 34995269 is about 327.0918918645.

The spelling of 34995269 in words is "thirty-four million, nine hundred ninety-five thousand, two hundred sixty-nine".