Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10101000001011111000000… |
… | …11110010111100001001001 |
3 | 20001200120222222010020000200 |
4 | 22200233200132113201021 |
5 | 22024420030230021011 |
6 | 242153555330122413 |
7 | 12511020602215416 |
oct | 1240574036274111 |
9 | 201616888106020 |
10 | 46230499063881 |
11 | 13804276549840 |
12 | 5227944720409 |
13 | 1ca4695826792 |
14 | b5b7d4bc510d |
15 | 552864983856 |
hex | 2a0be0797849 |
46230499063881 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 72848632808640. Its totient is φ = 28018263636000.
The previous prime is 46230499063849. The next prime is 46230499063897. The reversal of 46230499063881 is 18836099403264.
46230499063881 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 6 + 2 + 3 + 0 + 499 + 0 + 63 + 8 + 81 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 46230499063881 - 25 = 46230499063849 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×462304990638812 (a number of 28 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (46230499063841) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 11265540 + ... + 14811258.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3035359700360).
Almost surely, 246230499063881 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
46230499063881 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (26618133744759).
46230499063881 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
46230499063881 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3677437 (or 3677434 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 53747712, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 46230499063881 in words is "forty-six trillion, two hundred thirty billion, four hundred ninety-nine million, sixty-three thousand, eight hundred eighty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •