Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011101000010111101100 |
3 | 100200110010000 |
4 | 103220113230 |
5 | 2304133332 |
6 | 302144300 |
7 | 61512120 |
oct | 23502754 |
9 | 10613100 |
10 | 5146092 |
11 | 29a5376 |
12 | 1882090 |
13 | 10b2433 |
14 | 97d580 |
15 | 6b9b7c |
hex | 4e85ec |
5146092 has 60 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 15381520. Its totient is φ = 1469664.
The previous prime is 5146091. The next prime is 5146103. The reversal of 5146092 is 2906415.
5146092 is a `hidden beast` number, since 51 + 4 + 609 + 2 = 666.
5146092 is digitally balanced in base 4, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5146091) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1134 + ... + 3402.
Almost surely, 25146092 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a pronic number, being equal to 2268×2269.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 5146092, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (7690760).
5146092 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (10235428).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5146092 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5146092 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2292 (or 2281 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2160, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 5146092 is about 2268.4999448975. The cubic root of 5146092 is about 172.6470579608.
The spelling of 5146092 in words is "five million, one hundred forty-six thousand, ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •