Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110001101000110010… |
… | …001100011111000000 |
3 | 12002120101211102102002 |
4 | 301220302030133000 |
5 | 1333123141040402 |
6 | 40252400243132 |
7 | 3564523044200 |
oct | 615062143700 |
9 | 162511742362 |
10 | 53297596352 |
11 | 20670115aa0 |
12 | a3b53104a8 |
13 | 5044cbcc80 |
14 | 2818682400 |
15 | 15be120602 |
hex | c68c8c7c0 |
53297596352 has 336 divisors, whose sum is σ = 145651228128. Its totient is φ = 19020718080.
The previous prime is 53297596301. The next prime is 53297596399. The reversal of 53297596352 is 25369579235.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (56).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 70405958 + ... + 70406714.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (433485798).
Almost surely, 253297596352 is an apocalyptic number.
53297596352 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (52) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 53297596352, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (72825614064).
53297596352 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (92353631776).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
53297596352 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
53297596352 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 964 (or 947 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 15309000, while the sum is 56.
The spelling of 53297596352 in words is "fifty-three billion, two hundred ninety-seven million, five hundred ninety-six thousand, three hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.080 sec. • engine limits •