Search a number
-
+
53634503362031 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11000011000111110000011…
…00001010100010111101111
321000220102000202102222210122
430030133001201110113233
524012221430330041111
6310023203425555155
714203651664314364
oct1414370141242757
9230812022388718
1053634503362031
11160a92a0998999
1260228867a5abb
1323c0934258317
14d35cd0d3246b
1563025339ecdb
hex30c7c18545ef

53634503362031 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 53634503362032. Its totient is φ = 53634503362030.

The previous prime is 53634503361961. The next prime is 53634503362043. The reversal of 53634503362031 is 13026330543635.

It is a happy number.

53634503362031 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-53634503362031 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×536345033620312 (a number of 28 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (53634503362061) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 26817251681015 + 26817251681016.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (26817251681016).

Almost surely, 253634503362031 is an apocalyptic number.

53634503362031 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

53634503362031 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

53634503362031 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1749600, while the sum is 44.

The spelling of 53634503362031 in words is "fifty-three trillion, six hundred thirty-four billion, five hundred three million, three hundred sixty-two thousand, thirty-one".