Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111000000011110110… |
… | …011101111000100000 |
3 | 12202101000220202011212 |
4 | 320003312131320200 |
5 | 1441234200330333 |
6 | 43353001325252 |
7 | 4230444564266 |
oct | 700366357040 |
9 | 182330822155 |
10 | 60194151968 |
11 | 2358a036335 |
12 | b7baa96828 |
13 | 58a3a47702 |
14 | 2cb0592436 |
15 | 1874804448 |
hex | e03d9de20 |
60194151968 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 122202017280. Its totient is φ = 29168448000.
The previous prime is 60194151931. The next prime is 60194151971. The reversal of 60194151968 is 86915149106.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×601941519682 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 46193 + ... + 350031.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2545875360).
Almost surely, 260194151968 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 60194151968, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (61101008640).
60194151968 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (62007865312).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
60194151968 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
60194151968 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 304041 (or 304033 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 466560, while the sum is 50.
The spelling of 60194151968 in words is "sixty billion, one hundred ninety-four million, one hundred fifty-one thousand, nine hundred sixty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.062 sec. • engine limits •