Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101100011000000100001… |
… | …0110100010111110101100 |
3 | 210121001120100121222021100 |
4 | 1120300020112202332230 |
5 | 1244411214341012432 |
6 | 20545501121203100 |
7 | 1166431514660655 |
oct | 130601026427654 |
9 | 23531510558240 |
10 | 6098993688492 |
11 | 1a41628a33851 |
12 | 826038790490 |
13 | 353195532633 |
14 | 17129b33c52c |
15 | a89aeb9607c |
hex | 58c085a2fac |
6098993688492 has 18 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 15416900712668. Its totient is φ = 2032997896152.
The previous prime is 6098993688457. The next prime is 6098993688563. The reversal of 6098993688492 is 2948863998906.
It is a happy number.
6098993688492 is a `hidden beast` number, since 6 + 0 + 9 + 8 + 99 + 36 + 8 + 8 + 492 = 666.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (18).
It is a super-2 number, since 2×60989936884922 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 84708245638 + ... + 84708245709.
Almost surely, 26098993688492 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
6098993688492 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (9317907024176).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
6098993688492 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
6098993688492 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 169416491357 (or 169416491352 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2902376448, while the sum is 81.
The spelling of 6098993688492 in words is "six trillion, ninety-eight billion, nine hundred ninety-three million, six hundred eighty-eight thousand, four hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •