Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011100001010… |
… | …10100100000100 |
3 | 20201211222201200 |
4 | 11300222210010 |
5 | 144220041312 |
6 | 13331222500 |
7 | 2252311662 |
oct | 560524404 |
9 | 221758650 |
10 | 96643332 |
11 | 4a609625 |
12 | 28447a30 |
13 | 17039a06 |
14 | cb99c32 |
15 | 87400dc |
hex | 5c2a904 |
96643332 has 36 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 254916480. Its totient is φ = 30813552.
The previous prime is 96643319. The next prime is 96643343. The reversal of 96643332 is 23334669.
96643332 is a `hidden beast` number, since 9 + 6 + 643 + 3 + 3 + 2 = 666.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (36).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
It is a nialpdrome in base 10.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 57532 + ... + 59187.
Almost surely, 296643332 is an apocalyptic number.
96643332 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (92) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
96643332 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (158273148).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
96643332 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
96643332 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 116752 (or 116747 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 69984, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 96643332 is about 9830.7340519414. The cubic root of 96643332 is about 458.9062419744.
It can be divided in two parts, 9664 and 3332, that added together give a square (12996 = 1142).
The spelling of 96643332 in words is "ninety-six million, six hundred forty-three thousand, three hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •