Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110011000111110010111… |
… | …001100111011001000000000 |
3 | 110220122221200020111022020010 |
4 | 112120332113030323020000 |
5 | 100401341204444133122 |
6 | 545233553141144520 |
7 | 26512312660604040 |
oct | 2630762714731000 |
9 | 426587606438203 |
10 | 98473251942912 |
11 | 294162a9590690 |
12 | b0649389bb140 |
13 | 42c3cac2c1932 |
14 | 1a461b8da7720 |
15 | b5b7ae059e0c |
hex | 598f9733b200 |
98473251942912 has 640 divisors, whose sum is σ = 346899593576448. Its totient is φ = 24032024985600.
The previous prime is 98473251942887. The next prime is 98473251942913. The reversal of 98473251942912 is 21924915237489.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (66).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (98473251942913) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1192258737 + ... + 1192341327.
Almost surely, 298473251942912 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 98473251942912, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (173449796788224).
98473251942912 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (248426341633536).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
98473251942912 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
98473251942912 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 83240 (or 83224 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 78382080, while the sum is 66.
The spelling of 98473251942912 in words is "ninety-eight trillion, four hundred seventy-three billion, two hundred fifty-one million, nine hundred forty-two thousand, nine hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.095 sec. • engine limits •