Search a number
-
+
100101202192931 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10110110000101010100000…
…100110010010101000100011
3111010102120200220002121012112
4112300222200212102220203
5101110024230230133211
6552521505112545535
730041034051451352
oct2660524046225043
9433376626077175
10100101202192931
1129993755006655
12b28834a0b22ab
1343b166ca37044
141aa0cd17b3999
15b88cde32988b
hex5b0aa0992a23

100101202192931 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 100101202192932. Its totient is φ = 100101202192930.

The previous prime is 100101202192907. The next prime is 100101202192961. The reversal of 100101202192931 is 139291202101001.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 100101202192931 - 242 = 95703155681827 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×1001012021929313 (a number of 43 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (100101202192961) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 50050601096465 + 50050601096466.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (50050601096466).

Almost surely, 2100101202192931 is an apocalyptic number.

100101202192931 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

100101202192931 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

100101202192931 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1944, while the sum is 32.

Adding to 100101202192931 its reverse (139291202101001), we get a palindrome (239392404293932).

The spelling of 100101202192931 in words is "one hundred trillion, one hundred one billion, two hundred two million, one hundred ninety-two thousand, nine hundred thirty-one".