Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110110000111100111100… |
… | …101101111100010000010110 |
3 | 111010111110210201122010102000 |
4 | 112300330330231330100112 |
5 | 101110340302314011202 |
6 | 552534541504500130 |
7 | 30042334514265354 |
oct | 2660747455742026 |
9 | 433443721563360 |
10 | 100121001313302 |
11 | 299a1095101852 |
12 | b29015491a646 |
13 | 43b34a690a198 |
14 | 1aa1c4d1287d4 |
15 | b8959c61591c |
hex | 5b0f3cb7c416 |
100121001313302 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 226138509348960. Its totient is φ = 32826557806560.
The previous prime is 100121001313199. The next prime is 100121001313391. The reversal of 100121001313302 is 203313100121001.
100121001313302 is a `hidden beast` number, since 100 + 1 + 2 + 100 + 131 + 330 + 2 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 15197477173 + ... + 15197483760.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7066828417155).
Almost surely, 2100121001313302 is an apocalyptic number.
100121001313302 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (126017508035658).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
100121001313302 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
100121001313302 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 30394961005 (or 30394960999 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 108, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 100121001313302 its reverse (203313100121001), we get a palindrome (303434101434303).
The spelling of 100121001313302 in words is "one hundred trillion, one hundred twenty-one billion, one million, three hundred thirteen thousand, three hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •