Search a number
-
+
100210102020221 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10110110010001111111011…
…100010001010100001111101
3111010210222210022100000100012
4112302033323202022201331
5101113320242104121341
6553043515122113005
730051640513636244
oct2662177342124175
9433728708300305
10100210102020221
1129a25958133716
12b2a54804ab765
1343bba0632277b
141aa62a281195b
15b8ba64a550eb
hex5b23fb88a87d

100210102020221 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 100210102020222. Its totient is φ = 100210102020220.

The previous prime is 100210102020121. The next prime is 100210102020253. The reversal of 100210102020221 is 122020201012001.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 66313090591225 + 33897011428996 = 8143285^2 + 5822114^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-100210102020221 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 100210102020196 and 100210102020205.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (100210102020121) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 50105051010110 + 50105051010111.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (50105051010111).

Almost surely, 2100210102020221 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

100210102020221 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

100210102020221 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

100210102020221 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 32, while the sum is 14.

Adding to 100210102020221 its reverse (122020201012001), we get a palindrome (222230303032222).

The spelling of 100210102020221 in words is "one hundred trillion, two hundred ten billion, one hundred two million, twenty thousand, two hundred twenty-one".